September 5, 2025

Top AI tools for data in 2025

AI is reshaping how data teams work, but not all tools deliver reliable results. This guide breaks down the top AI tools for data in 2025—from OpenAI and Anthropic to dbt, Snowflake, and Secoda AI—showing their strengths, limitations, and the importance of context for accurate, trusted outcomes.
Ainslie Eck
Data Governance Specialist

AI is already transforming how teams write code, generate legal documents, and summarize complex information. But when it comes to data, adoption has lagged behind. Tools like ChatGPT can interpret static files or answer simple questions, yet they struggle to produce reliable, actionable outputs from raw or even modelled data.

The reason is simple: business data isn’t just rows and columns. It comes with complex relationships, evolving schemas, ownership, governance rules, and metric definitions that differ across every organization. Without this surrounding context, AI outputs risk being wrong, inconsistent, or irrelevant, undermining trust and slowing adoption.

This guide breaks down the top AI tools for data in 2025, why context is the key differentiator, and how your team can move from experimentation to dependable outcomes.

Secoda AI charting orders over time

Commercial LLMs

1. OpenAI (ChatGPT)

OpenAI’s ChatGPT remains the most widely adopted large language model, with strong reasoning abilities and an intuitive chat-based interface that makes it accessible for both technical and non-technical users. Its plugin ecosystem and Model Context Protocol (MCP) support allow it to connect with external applications like Google Drive, GitHub, and Intercom, extending its reach into business workflows.

Strengths:

  • Best-in-class general reasoning and natural language understanding
  • Wide adoption and user familiarity across industries
  • Expanding ecosystem through plugins and MCP integrations
  • Strong support for prototyping conversational data applications

Limitations:

  • No native understanding of structured or governed data systems
  • Hallucinated SQL and shallow answers are common without metadata context
  • Requires additional infrastructure (retrieval layers, access control, and metadata injection) to be usable for analytics
  • Not inherently aware of lineage, ownership, or governance rules

Best for: Early exploration, prototyping conversational data assistants, and lightweight querying when context requirements are low.

2. Anthropic (Claude)

Anthropic’s Claude has gained traction for its emphasis on safety, alignment, and interpretability. Its large context window supports longer prompts, making it well-suited for document-heavy workflows and extended reasoning tasks.

Strengths:

  • Safety-first approach with reduced hallucination risk
  • Large context window supports analyzing long documents or codebases
  • Strong performance on reasoning-heavy tasks
  • Accessible through APIs and integrations with productivity apps

Limitations:

  • Lacks native integrations with data catalogs, warehouses, or BI tools
  • Still requires external infrastructure to incorporate metadata, lineage, and access rules
  • Less developer ecosystem compared to OpenAI

Best for: Safe experimentation, document summarization, and unstructured analysis where interpretability and longer context are priorities.

3. Gemini (Google DeepMind)

Google’s Gemini is designed as a multimodal model, capable of reasoning across text, code, images, and even video. It integrates tightly with Google Workspace, making it appealing for organizations already embedded in Google’s productivity ecosystem.

Strengths:

  • Multimodal capabilities (text, code, images, and beyond)
  • Seamless integration with Google Workspace (Docs, Sheets, Gmail)
  • Backed by Google’s infrastructure and scale
  • Useful for teams combining structured documents with broader business workflows

Limitations:

  • Primarily focused on Google ecosystem integrations
  • Limited visibility into data warehouses, pipelines, or governance layers
  • Requires additional engineering effort to adapt for structured data reasoning

Best for: Organizations in the Google ecosystem looking for AI support across documents, emails, and collaborative workflows.

4. Grok (xAI)

Developed by xAI and integrated with X (formerly Twitter), Grok is positioned as a conversational assistant with personality and real-time awareness of X’s social graph. While less enterprise-focused than other models, it offers quick responses and unique cultural positioning.

Strengths:

  • Built-in integration with X (Twitter) for real-time updates
  • Designed for conversational speed and casual use
  • Distinctive brand voice and user experience

Limitations:

  • Not optimized for enterprise data workflows
  • No support for metadata, lineage, or governed environments
  • Narrow integration ecosystem compared to OpenAI or Anthropic

Best for: Informal exploration, real-time conversational insights, or early-stage testing. Not for governed analytics or enterprise-scale data reasoning.

Enterprise search tools

5. Notion AI

Notion AI extends the popular workspace tool with AI-powered summarization, drafting, and search across documents and wikis. It’s especially effective at finding references inside notes, specs, or onboarding materials.

Strengths:

  • Seamless integration with existing Notion workspaces
  • Strong at summarizing and reformatting unstructured content
  • User-friendly for non-technical audiences

Limitations:

  • Treats SQL and schema references as text with no structural understanding
  • Cannot reason over table joins, metric definitions, or freshness
  • No role-based access control for sensitive data

Best for: Navigating documentation, policies, and project notes, but less effective for structured data environments.

6. Glean

Glean provides enterprise-wide search across documents, Slack, email, and other collaboration tools. It’s optimized for surfacing references from across large organizations.

Strengths:

  • Unified search across multiple enterprise knowledge sources
  • Strong at indexing and ranking organizational content
  • Helpful for finding buried policies, files, or communications

Limitations:

  • No understanding of schemas, lineage, or governance rules
  • Returns text snippets without validating against structured data
  • Not suited for SQL generation or metadata reasoning

Best for: Enterprise knowledge management. Ideal for surfacing unstructured references across silos, but not for structured data analysis.

In-house or open source models

7. Llama 3 (Meta)

An open-weight model from Meta, Llama 3 allows organizations to deploy models internally with more control.

Strengths:

  • Open weights and strong developer community
  • Flexible deployment options for on-prem or private cloud
  • Good baseline for building custom AI systems

Limitations:

  • Requires significant engineering effort for metadata integration and access control
  • Less tuned for enterprise data reasoning out of the box
  • Ongoing costs of hosting and maintenance

Best for: Teams with infrastructure expertise who want customizable, self-hosted models.

8. Mistral

Mistral offers efficient, lightweight open-source models that balance performance with low compute requirements.

Strengths:

  • Smaller, efficient models optimized for cost
  • Good for edge deployments or lightweight internal tasks
  • Rapidly growing ecosystem and community

Limitations:

  • Out-of-the-box accuracy is lower for complex reasoning
  • Still requires custom pipelines for metadata and governance
  • Limited enterprise-specific integrations

Best for: Cost-conscious organizations experimenting with open-source AI.

9. Falcon

Falcon is a performance-optimized open-source model backed by Abu Dhabi’s TII, available for commercial and research use.

Strengths:

  • Open-source licensing for enterprise use
  • Strong performance benchmarks among non-proprietary models
  • Actively developed for scalable deployment

Limitations:

  • No built-in data governance or schema reasoning
  • Requires engineering investment to integrate with metadata systems
  • Maintenance and scaling costs fall on the organization

Best for: Research teams and enterprises looking for cost-effective experimentation with customizable open-source AI.

Native AI features in data tools

10. dbt AI

dbt’s AI features support tasks within its transformation layer, such as generating SQL, documenting models, and creating tests.

Strengths:

  • Purpose-built for dbt workflows
  • Automates repetitive transformation tasks
  • Improves developer productivity for model creation

Limitations:

  • Context limited to dbt environment only
  • No visibility into BI dashboards or warehouse governance
  • Cannot reason across lineage outside dbt models

Best for: Streamlining dbt development and documentation.

11. Snowflake Cortex / Snowflake AI

Snowflake integrates AI and natural language features directly into the warehouse. These include natural language querying, anomaly detection, and semantic search for warehouse-resident data.

Strengths:

  • Directly embedded in Snowflake’s environment
  • Strong for anomaly detection and warehouse-specific queries
  • Reduces friction for business users inside Snowflake

Limitations:

  • No awareness of upstream or downstream context
  • Scope limited to the warehouse’s schema and logic
  • Still requires BI tools for visualization and collaboration

Best for: Querying, exploring, and monitoring data directly within Snowflake.

12. BI platforms (Looker, Tableau, Sigma)

Modern BI platforms are embedding AI assistants for dashboard exploration and natural language querying.

Strengths:

  • Easy for business users to ask natural language questions of dashboards
  • Reduces dependency on analysts for basic exploration
  • Well-tuned for visualization-specific tasks

Limitations:

  • No insight into transformations, lineage, or upstream definitions
  • Context isolated to a single BI layer
  • Can return misleading results if dashboards are outdated or inconsistent

Best for: Lightweight, self-service analytics directly within BI tools.

Integrated AI platforms

13. Secoda AI

Secoda AI is built on a foundation of business context: lineage, documentation, metadata, and governance. This foundation enables it to deliver accurate, context-aware outputs and minimize many of the risks associated with general-purpose AI systems.

How it works:

Secoda AI is powered by a multi-agent system. Each agent specializes in tasks like lineage parsing, query synthesis, or semantic search, and they collaborate to interpret user questions, retrieve context from across the metadata graph, and resolve ambiguous inputs before generating a response.

When a user asks a question, Secoda AI references lineage paths, ownership metadata, access policies, and historical documentation. For example, if asked about a column, it can show how that column was created, how it’s used downstream, who owns it, and whether its definition aligns with business logic. This helps to prevent hallucinated SQL and irrelevant results.

Key strengths:

  • Context-aware answers grounded in lineage, governance, and usage patterns
  • Adaptive reasoning that adjusts as schemas evolve and permissions change
  • Built-in validation that enforces access policies, applies parameter checks, and ensures outputs map back to metadata sources
  • Continuous learning, where validated answers are stored as memories to improve future responses
  • Embedded experience: AI is woven into documentation, search, catalog browsing, and monitoring. Users can ask questions, explore assets, and act in one workspace without switching tools.
  • Visual outputs: For metric-related questions, Secoda AI can generate lightweight charts directly in the environment, avoiding the need to spin up dashboards in a BI tool.

Best for: Organizations that prioritize governance, accuracy, and trust in AI outputs. Rather than replacing data teams, Secoda AI enhances their workflows with context-driven reasoning, structured problem solving, and collaborative context sharing.

What to evaluate before choosing an AI tool?

  • Governance and access control — Must respect RBAC and enforce auditability.
  • Context and metadata awareness — Schema, lineage, definitions, and ownership must inform outputs.
  • Implementation complexity — Consider setup and long-term maintenance burden.
  • Total cost of ownership — Look beyond LLM token usage to infrastructure and monitoring costs.
  • Accuracy and risk — Prevent silent failures from hallucinated SQL or schema drift.

Bottom line

AI is quickly becoming an essential part of the modern data stack, but not all tools are built to deliver reliable outcomes. Commercial LLMs like OpenAI and Anthropic offer powerful reasoning, enterprise search tools make knowledge easier to find, and native AI features in dbt, Snowflake, or BI platforms bring helpful automation for specific tasks. Each has a place, but each also comes with limitations when it comes to governance, lineage, and metadata context.

That’s where context becomes the differentiator. Without visibility into schema evolution, ownership, or access controls, even the most advanced models risk producing outputs that are inconsistent or incomplete. Data teams need solutions that can embed AI directly into the systems they already rely on, respecting governance and adapting as the environment changes.

For organizations serious about scaling AI in data, platforms like Secoda AI provide the foundation that others lack. By grounding every response in metadata, lineage, and governance, Secoda transforms AI from experimental to dependable, helping data teams deliver accurate, secure, and scalable insights their business can trust.

Keep reading

View all